Archive for the ‘From Glen Hunter’ Category

  • Tydingco-Gatewood Issues Order on Emergency Motion

    0
    Judge Tydingco-Gatewood has issued the following order resolving issues that were raised in the Johnson Lawsuit Emergency Motion. As expected, the order notes that all parties have agreed to engage in good faith negotiations and the court expects that to be adhered to. The order maintains that the CNMI government must continue to make the $10 million budgeted payments to the months throughout FY13. The order also brings to a halt any distributions of employee contributions to active employees as Read more [...]
  • Judge Tydingco-Gatewood Urges Good Faith Settlement Talks By All Parties

    0
    Governor Inos took the stand in the emergency hearing this morning. He agreed with all parties to put a hold on major portions of PL 18-02 and agreed to move forward with good faith negotiations in the on-going Global Settlement in front of Judge Faris. The Governor asked that the settlement proceedings move forward at a quick pace. As it stands now, all parties, except the government, have supplied Faris with their settlement proposals. The CNMI Government intends to submit theirs by the end of Read more [...]
  • Ad Litem Report to Federal Court January 2013

    0

    Here is a copy of the NMIRF’s Trustee Ad Litem Report that was submitted to the court in writing on 1/10/13 and presented to them at the 1/15/13 Court Hearing.

    https://docs.google.com/file/d/0BwUHx_KkACEqNHpPZ0JpOUw3dzA/edit

  • Fitial: Complete Reversal on Administration’s Stance on POB

    4
    After nearly 4 years of the Fitial Administration aggressively pushing for a Pension Obligation Bond (POB) and just a week after the Office of the Attorney General presented the POB to the Federal Courts as one of the Government's main solutions, Fitial has come out publicly and reversed that position completely. Fitial told reporters on 1/22/13  that a POB is not a solution for the NMIRF and stated that it would be too expensive and would incur more public debt. At the Federal Court Read more [...]
  • Apology from Glen

    2
    I would like to apologize to anyone who received the dirty laundry I emailed out in haste earlier today [subject was Re: Tailored conversation]. I am coming under attack from certain people with hell-bent personal motives. The latest attacks label me an "opportunist". I can not imagine what profit anyone thinks that I stand to personally gain from pushing for government accountability and for all attempts to be made to try and sure up the NMIRF and stave off this administration's attempts Read more [...]
  • More Notes From 1/15/13 Federal Court Hearing

    3
    FY2013 NMIRF General Figures : CNMI Government Contributed:$12 million Investment Return: $5.5 million NMIRF Payout $73 million Joyce Tang (Ad Litem) stated that actions of the CNMI Government to first pass 17-82 and then under-fund the NMIRF has shown an "intent by the Government to abandon the Fund". Tang went on further to state that it was "clear what the CNMI Government was thinking. They don't really care." Tang explained that renegotiated Health and Life Premiums has saved Read more [...]
  • Judge Faris to Oversee Settlement Negotiations

    1
    Here are various media accounts of the hearing: Marianas Variety -Parties agree to settle in Betty Johnson case Notes:After a full day hearing yesterday in CNMI District Court, Judge Tydingco-Gatewood issued a tentative ruling ordering all parties involved in the Betty Johnson Lawsuit to enter into voluntary settlement negotiations. Judge Tydingco-Gatewood has assigned Federal Bankruptcy Court Judge Faris to head the negotiations. Prior to the hearing on the Government's motion to Read more [...]
  • New Media Statements by Huesman Counter Fund’s Filed Statements

    2
    In an odd turn of events, Braddock Huesman has issued media statements that directly counter the statements that he filed just weeks ago in favor of Receivership of the NMIRF. In a Marianas Variety article published today Huesman is quoted as saying that "The Fund’s Amended Answer and Cross Claims discloses that the new request of the Fund is for a receivership over the CNMI Department of Finance — and not over the Fund itself.” Huesman is now stating that the media may have caused confusion Read more [...]
  • NMIRF Does Complete 180 In Terms of Receivership

    2
    For the past 3 years the NMIRF, their board of trustees and their hired outside legal counsel have fought against Federal Receivership at all costs. Clients and attorneys involved in the Roe/Doe (now Johnson) lawsuit were labeled destructive for filing a suit in Federal Court and asking for just that as a possible remedy - Federal Receivership.  Surprisingly, the NMIRF through its attorneys has just filed a document that is now in full agreement with what the NMIRF has been actively fighting against Read more [...]
  • Coverage of Impeachment of Governor Fitial

    0
    House Resolution 17-111 focuses on the Impeachment of Governor Benigno Fitial. It contains 16 Articles of Impeachment and was signed by 7 members of the House of Representatives (Rep. Joe Deleon Guerrero, Rep. Janet Maratita, Rep. Antonio Sablan, Rep. Frank Dela Cruz, Rep Ramon Tebuteb, Rep Ray Yumul and Rep Trenton Conner). Article XV deals directly with the NMIRF. You can view HR17-111 here. An 8 member Special Committee on HR 17-111 was created and spent 11 days listening to testimonies Read more [...]
  • A Personal Letter to the Trustee ad litem From Glen Hunter

    1
    ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Glen Hunter <glenhunter@gmail.com> Date: Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 9:58 AM Subject: NMIRF Concerns for the Trustee ad litem To: pciville@guamattorneys.com, jtang@guamattorneys.com Cc: tmercer@guamattorneys.com Good Morning Mr. Civille and Ms. Tang, I am unsure if you are the proper contact or even if it is proper at all for me to be contacting your firm. I have been following the NMIRF fiasco for many years. 2 of my mothers are NMIRF Defined Read more [...]
  • Tydingco-Gatewood Names Lawfirm of Civille & Tang as Trustee ad litem

    3
    Federal District Court Judge Tydingco-Gatewood has appointed the boutique law firm of Ceville & Tang, PLLC to act as the Trustee ad litem for the Johnson (formerly Roe/Doe) Lawsuit. Specifically acting on behalf of the firm will be the Attorney Joseph C. Razzano. He is expected to be in Saipan to start the arduous task of dealing with the NMIRF on Monday (9/17) morning. Carolyn Kern has agreed to stay on for a week and will provide direct legal counsel to Razzano. Notes from Federal Court Read more [...]
  • HB 17-315 Signed by Fitial – Now PL17-82

    50
    HB 17-315 also known as "The CNMI Pension Reform Act of 2012" is now law. It is Public Law 17-82.  The impacts this law will have on the NMIRF are not truly known. This is due to the fact that no analysis has been provided and it appears that no fiscal impact studies were ever conducted. I know that there has been a bit of discussion concerning HB 17-315 (which is now PL 17-82) and an earlier HB 17-312 (which is now law PL 17-79). Both these laws are more important than some may assume. They Read more [...]
  • Thank You to the Roe/Doe Attorneys (from Glen Hunter)

    5
    I have thanked them many times in the past 3 years but I would like to publicly thank the Roe/Doe Attorneys, Bruce Jorgensen, Steve Woodruff, Margery Bronster and Robert Hatch once again. They have been on the side of the Defined Benefit Plan Members for the past years. They have been fighting in Federal Court to protect the Fund Assets and effectuate collection efforts of the default judgement against the CNMI Government. They have been doing and admirable job along the way despite the many obstacles Read more [...]
  • A Plea to Judge Govendo From the Son of Retirees

    6
    Judge Kenneth Govendo, I realize that there may be some pressure being placed on the local court to move the NMIRF vs. CNMI case into receivership in order to stave off any federal attempts at possible federal mediation or federal receivership. I would like to publicly request that if you are considering the idea of placing the NMIRF into local receivership that you suspend such action until after the Roe/Doe case has had a chance to be heard in Federal Court. It appears that the delay tactics Read more [...]
Page 1 of 212»